Project size
How many active spaces, finish zones, and adjacent environments need visibility.
How to choose coverage
We size the program around the project, not around arbitrary device counts.
Coverage is shaped by monitored zones, project duration, sensitivity of the spaces, and how strong the final documentation needs to be.
Project-based coverageNo equipment for your team to manageDocumentation aligned to turnover risk
Duration
How long conditions need to be monitored through install, stabilization, or turnover.
Risk level
How costly it would be if drift goes unseen until late in the job.
Documentation needs
How detailed the weekly reporting and final handoff package need to be.
Targeted
For smaller scopes, selected finish zones, or projects that need focused monitoring in the highest-risk areas.
- Key zones monitored
- Live dashboard visibility
- Alerting on exceptions
- Weekly reporting
Full
For most commercial and institutional projects that need multi-zone visibility plus stronger reporting through closeout.
- Multi-zone monitoring
- Real-time alerts
- Weekly summaries + trend views
- Closeout-ready documentation
Critical
For healthcare, controlled spaces, and owner-sensitive projects where documentation scrutiny is highest.
- High-density monitored zones
- Immediate exception visibility
- Detailed reporting cadence
- Owner-grade final package
Coverage comparison
Clear differences in density, response, and reporting.
| Category | Targeted | Full | Critical |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typical use | Selected risk areas | Most commercial projects | Controlled or owner-sensitive projects |
| Zone density | Focused coverage | Multi-zone visibility | Higher-density visibility |
| Alerts | Exception alerts | Real-time exception alerts | Immediate attention on drift |
| Reporting | Weekly summaries | Weekly summaries + trends | Detailed reporting package |
| Closeout package | Included | Full package | Owner-grade package |
Pricing is built around project size, duration, density of coverage, and documentation expectations. The result is predictable project coverage without your team having to buy or manage the monitoring stack.
How teams use these models
Coverage usually shifts with the project phase, the finish package, and the turnover risk.
During active finish work
Use targeted or full coverage where adhesives, coatings, millwork, flooring, and sensitive interiors need a live environmental record while work is still moving.
As turnover gets closer
Teams often increase reporting rigor, keep closer watch on higher-risk zones, and prepare owner-facing documentation so closeout does not become a scramble.
After handoff
Coverage can continue for selected areas when moisture-sensitive finishes, owner concerns, or callback exposure make a stronger post-turnover record worthwhile.
What shapes the final program
Project coverage is usually sized around a few practical decisions.
Finish scope
Flooring, coatings, millwork, tenant improvements, and controlled spaces do not all need the same density or reporting cadence.
Schedule pressure
Tighter schedules and compressed turnover windows usually call for stronger live visibility and faster exception review.
Owner documentation
When owner teams or facilities stakeholders expect a cleaner handoff file, the program should be built around that standard from the start.
Find the Right Coverage Level
We’ll help you match coverage, reporting, and documentation to your project scope and turnover expectations.